Tag: New Zealand

The Unfulfilled Dream and the Looming Challenge: Team Melli at a Crossroads

Team Melli’s campaign at the 2026 FIFA World Cup ended in bitter disappointment, despite widespread expectations that the expanded 48-team format would finally pave the way for a historic group-stage breakthrough. With twelve groups and an increased knockout berth allocation, the barrier to reaching the Round of 32 had ostensibly never been lower. Yet, three consecutive stalemates—a gritty but goalless draw against New Zealand, a resilient but ultimately fruitless point against Belgium, and a tightly contested tie with Egypt- proved to be Iran’s undoing. In a group where wins were imperative, these draws left the team stranded, falling agonizingly short of securing a spot among the world’s top 32.

In the immediate aftermath, the Football Federation Islamic Republic of Iran (FFIRI) published two separate assessment reports on its official platform. These documents served a dual purpose: they candidly acknowledged that the national team had fallen short of its pre-tournament objectives, while simultaneously pivoting the narrative toward the future—specifically, the upcoming AFC Asian Cup 2027. While such transparency is commendable on paper, the reports have done little to quell the growing unease among fans and pundits regarding the federation’s capacity to deliver tangible results.

As Team Melli now pivots its preparations toward the Asian Cup, the FFIRI has publicly declared an unequivocal ambition: to reach the final and lift the continental trophy for the first time since 1976. However, when measured against the current trajectory of the squad, the stagnation of the coaching philosophy, and the persistent managerial volatility, this goal appears more aspirational than achievable. The hard truth is that ambition, unaccompanied by structural reform, remains hollow rhetoric.

Looking back at the 2023 Asian Cup (held in early 2024) offers a stark point of contrast. At that tournament, Iran boasted a younger, more energetic core—a side capable of high-intensity transitions and resilient defensive work. Despite shaky group-stage performances against Hong Kong and Syria in the knock-out stage, where the team looked vulnerable and disjointed, they rose to the occasion in the quarter-finals. The dramatic, hard-fought victory over Japan, their perennial tormentor in recent decades, was undoubtedly the high-water mark of the campaign, exorcising deep-seated psychological barriers and igniting hopes of a long-awaited final berth. Yet, having scaled that monumental peak, the team suffered a catastrophic letdown against Qatar in the semi-finals, squandering a golden opportunity and extending Iran’s agonizing wait for a continental final appearance to more than half a century.

Fast-forward to the present, and the grim arithmetic is undeniable. How can a squad that was palpably younger and more dynamic just four years ago—now with its star veterans well into their thirties and physically declining—suddenly rediscover the legs and intensity required to conquer Asia? More pressingly, how can the same tactical blueprint, administered by the same coaching staff that oddly perceives the 2026 World Cup performance as a moral achievement, magically transform into a championship-winning formula? The insistence on defensive conservatism, a lack of creative midfield fluidity, and an over-reliance on aging individual brilliance rather than collective tactical evolution have rendered the team predictable and stagnant.

It is constructive for the Football Federation to speak openly about its aspirations, but its directors must internalize a fundamental principle: declaring a goal does not actualize it. To bridge the chasm between ambition and execution, the FFIRI must urgently conduct a rigorous, top-to-bottom gap analysis. This requires an aggressive, no-nonsense review of the entire footballing pyramid—from youth development pipelines to senior squad selection. Specifically, the federation must scrutinize preparation protocols, set-piece efficiency, physical conditioning regimes, and, most critically, the tactical flexibility of the coaching unit.

Currently, the federation’s proposed remedy is woefully vague. Promises of holding training camps in East and West Asia, devoid of specific opponents, logistical clarity, or strategic intent, inspire little confidence. In the modern competitive landscape, where rivals like Japan, South Korea, Australia, and Saudi Arabia are meticulously fine-tuning their systems with high-quality friendlies and data-driven methodologies, Iran cannot afford to rely on nebulous planning.

The bottom line is that in contemporary football, self-congratulation and hollow talking points are irrelevant currencies. At this juncture, with the current roster composition and an uninspired technical bench, the dream of reaching the Asian Cup final remains just that, a dream steeped in wishful thinking. The countdown is merciless. With barely six months remaining until the tournament kicks off in Saudi Arabia, the margin for error has completely evaporated. The FFIRI must move beyond rhetoric, embrace uncomfortable reforms, and act decisively—or risk watching yet another generation of talent squander its legacy on the continental stage.

Framing Failure as Glory: The Dangerous Delusion Behind Iran's World Cup Exit

After Iran’s early exit from the group stage of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, social media has been flooded with criticism aimed at both the team and its head coach. Unsurprisingly, however, the official media and the team’s staunch defenders have framed the failure as a remarkable achievement.

The Minister of Sport, who had previously advocated for Iran’s withdrawal from the World Cup in response to American hostility, has now suddenly praised the team’s performance and fighting spirit. Meanwhile, IRIB commentators have consistently highlighted the positives—pointing out that Iran remained undefeated in all three matches—as if that alone were a triumph, conveniently ignoring the fact that a country with such a rich footballing pedigree has not advanced past the group stage since 1978.

Politics and the antagonistic treatment of Team Melli by the U.S. aside, the squad’s overall performance, coaching standards, leadership, and mentality left much to be desired. The team lacked a winning mindset, often faltered in crucial moments, and was, on the whole, mediocre and inconsistent. Technically and emotionally, Team Melli ranked low compared to its rivals.

Among the many critics is former national team coach Jalal Cheraghpour. Reflecting on Iran’s opening match, he said: “Caution was understandable for our first game, but we were overly cautious against a New Zealand side that grew in confidence precisely because of our passive approach. While it made sense to be wary of an unknown opponent, we took it too far. Every goal we conceded only deepened our fear. After that match, with the strategy apparently set on securing two draws in the remaining games, I knew we wouldn’t progress.”

He continued: “We should have played with more courage and fighting spirit in the next two matches. Moreover, the squad’s high average age meant we lacked the energy needed at this level of competition. On the other hand, if either Egypt or Belgium had won their match, our path would have been easier—but the draw complicated things. Qualification became a matter of ‘ifs’ and ‘buts.’ On the final matchday, none of the three possible scenarios that could have sent us through materialized, and we left the tournament empty-handed.”

Addressing the team’s defensive frailty—one of Team Melli’s Achilles’ heels throughout the tournament—Cheraghpour observed: “A team needs creative, talented players in attack. That kind of flair is innate; no one teaches Mehdi Taremi or Mehdi Ghaedi how to dribble. But defending is a scientific discipline that demands deeper knowledge and familiarity with modern tactics. Look at our games—when we don’t have the ball, we should press, but we don’t. When the opposition dominates, our job is to cover the spaces they can exploit. We failed to do that. We often had three or more defenders converging on the ball carrier in dangerous areas, yet we left gaps elsewhere because players bunched together. That was our undoing. Crowding an area without covering the spaces is like sending a soldier into battle without ammunition—it achieves nothing.”

He cited New Zealand’s second goal as an example: “In that scene, Chris Woods, the veteran Kiwi player, controls the ball, turns, and delivers a precise short pass completely unpressured—while our players simply watched. These defensive weaknesses, evident in all three games, stem from a lack of simulation and practice in training. Defenders must be able to read the game and anticipate an opponent’s next move. These skills are not being taught to defenders in our football, whether at club or national level. They keep making basic mistakes and tactical errors, with no apparent correction or guidance from the coaching staff.”

When asked what path Iranian football should take to move forward, Cheraghpour replied: “These shortcomings need to be analyzed and studied by the Football Federation’s training committee, and then compiled into training manuals and courses.”

He added: “Iranian football needs a major shake-up. Thirteen or fourteen players from this squad should be moved on. We have to move beyond traditional, direct tactics and embrace modern football—only then will we see real progress.”

Ghalenoei Under the Gun – Tactical Overhaul Urgently Needed as Belgium Looms

Team Melli's 2-2 draw against New Zealand—a match widely perceived as the most winnable of the three group fixtures—has drawn fierce criticism toward head coach Amir Ghalenoei and a host of underperforming players. With the toughest test of the group stage arriving tomorrow against Belgium, Ghalenoei finds himself with no room for error. He must not only mitigate the expected damage but also salvage Iran's fading hopes of advancing to the knockout rounds.

Limited Options, Limited Vision

Frankly, Ghalenoei does not have a wealth of options at his disposal. The squad lacks strength in depth, and there is no clearly defined, coherent game plan that the coach can confidently deploy. Nevertheless, it is imperative that the technical staff rise to the occasion and devise a strategy capable of neutralizing a completely different threat in the form of Belgium's golden generation.

Defensive Crisis – The Achilles' Heel

The most critical area of concern remains the backline. Alireza Beiranvand is the only viable option in goal, despite a performance against New Zealand that did little to inspire confidence. His shot-stopping was suspect, and his distribution remains a persistent liability.

In central defense, the options are available but far from reassuring. Shoja Khalilzadeh is slow, error-prone, and was directly at fault for both goals conceded against the Kiwis. Ali Nemati offered little alongside him, displaying minimal understanding or coordination with his partner. It is becoming increasingly apparent that Nemati is uncomfortable in the heart of Iran's defense at this level.

The alternative is Mohammad Hossein Kanaanizadegan, Khalilzadeh's usual partner, who has inexplicably found himself on the bench. Also available is Danial Eiri, but selecting him would require a level of courage that Ghalenoei has conspicuously failed to demonstrate throughout his tenure. The odds strongly favor Kanaanizadegan's return to the starting lineup alongside Khalilzadeh, tasked with the unenviable job of neutralizing Romelu Lukaku, who is expected to lead Belgium's attack.

Flank Warfare – Containing the Doku Threat

On the flanks, Ghalenoei has a potential solution in the form of Saleh Hardani—a tenacious, hard-tackling defender who can be deployed specifically to contain the explosive Jérémy Doku. However, Hardani alone may not be sufficient to neutralize a player of Doku's caliber.

This is where Ramin Rezaeian becomes pivotal. By utilizing Rezaeian in a dual role—operating as both a pseudo-right-back and an attacking right winger—Ghalenoei could kill two birds with one stone. Rezaeian possesses the experience, skill, and quality to execute such a demanding role, and history has shown that the closer he gets to the opponent's goal, the more influential he becomes. Deploying both Hardani and Rezaeian simultaneously would create a defensive-offensive partnership while ensuring there is no empty space behind Rezaeian for Doku to exploit on the counter.

Midfield Malaise – Time for Change

The midfield was arguably the weakest link against New Zealand, with Saeed Ezzatollahi and Saman Ghoddos delivering performances that ranged from anonymous to outright detrimental. Introducing Mohammad Ghorbani could provide much-needed defensive solidity and energy in the middle of the park. Ghoddos, for his part, faces no serious challenger for his position—but that is more a reflection of the squad's lack of depth than his own form. The hope is that he will finally wake up and deliver a performance worthy of his reputation against Belgium.

Frontline Adjustments – Time for Ghaedi

In attack, starting Mehdi Ghaedi could give Iran the creative spark and dribbling threat that was sorely missing against New Zealand. Keeping Mohammad Mohebi and Mehdi Taremi in their respective positions remains the best available solution, but Ghalenoei must ensure that the forward line operates with greater cohesion and understanding than it showed in the opener.

The Mental Battle – Composure Is Key

Beyond tactics and personnel, Ghalenoei and his coaching staff must address the emotional fragility that plagued the team against New Zealand. Haste, confusion, and a lack of composure were evident in nearly every area of the pitch. Experienced Iranian players repeatedly failed to execute simple moves or complete basic passes—a damning indictment of their mental state. With only hours remaining before the Belgium clash, this psychological deficiency must be urgently addressed. Whether it can be fixed in such a short time remains highly doubtful.

System Shuffle or Structural Fracture? Dissecting Team Melli's Tactical Identity Crisis Ahead of Belgium

While Team Melli's performance and result against New Zealand fell short of expectations, the outing was far from the doomsday scenario that critics had prophesied. Predictions of collapse, fueled by contentious player selections, a perceived lack of attacking punch, questionable squad character, and the ever-present shadow of off-pitch political interference, proved exaggerated. Yet, to dismiss the concerns entirely would be equally misguided.

Tactical shortcomings were evident. The defensive fragility, a theme rehearsed ad nauseam, remains the most visible flaw. But more alarming, and arguably more consequential, was the glaring inadequacy in midfield: a void of depth, influence, and effective ball progression that left Iran disjointed and reactive for large stretches of the match.

Three Years, Five Systems, One Persistent Question

It has been three years and three months since Amir Ghalenoei assumed the reins of Team Melli. In that period, he has overseen 44 official matches—including the World Cup opener against New Zealand—deploying no fewer than five distinct starting formations. The preparatory friendlies in March and June, ostensibly the final testing ground for tactical experimentation, saw Ghalenoei cycle through a veritable carousel of systems:

  • Against Nigeria, he unveiled a three-center-back setup with a 4–4–1 structure for the first time.
  • Against Costa Rica, he reverted to his preferred 4–3–1–2, yielding an emphatic victory.
  • Against Gambia, he shifted to a 4–4–2 with two holding midfielders.
  • Against Mali, after a lengthy hiatus, he dusted off a 4–4–1–1.

Despite this tinkering, it was widely anticipated that Ghalenoei would lean on his favored system against New Zealand—arguably the group's most forgiving opponent. And so he did. Iran took the field in a 4–3–1–2 formation, the nineteenth time he has employed this setup from the opening whistle.

The Starting XI and Structural Blueprint:

  • Center-backs: Nemati and Khalilzadeh held the spine.
  • Full-backs: Ramin Rezaian (right) and Milad Mohammadi (left) provided width.
  • Sole defensive midfielder: Saeed Ezzatollahi sat deep, tasked with shielding the backline.
  • Wingers: Aria Yousefi (left) and Mohammad Mohebi (right), though Yousefi was deployed in an unnatural left-wing role, a position he had only recently trialed in training.
  • Playmaker: Saman Ghoddos operated between the lines.
  • Strikers: Shahriar Moghanloo and Mehdi Taremi formed the attacking duo, with their positioning fluctuating throughout.

Crucially, Yousefi's unfamiliarity with the left flank was compounded by Mohebi's altered responsibilities—he was forced to track back and cover the space behind Rezaian, who was given license to bomb forward relentlessly. The result was a lopsided, occasionally chaotic structure that invited pressure.

Substitutions Without Systemic Evolution

Recognizing the ineffectiveness of his initial setup, Ghalenoei turned to his bench. However, the substitutions did little to alter the underlying tactical framework:

  • Ghaedi replaced Yousefi on the left wing.
  • Alipour came on for Moghanloo.
  • Hajsafi took over Ghoddos's creative role.
  • Hosseinzadeh entered for Taremi.

Personnel changed; the system did not. Iran continued to labour within the same structural constraints, failing to address the midfield disconnect or the defensive vulnerabilities that New Zealand exploited with alarming ease.

Belgium: A Different Beast Entirely

The challenge against Belgium will be of an entirely different magnitude. The Red Devils possess superior technical quality, greater attacking depth, and a midfield engine capable of overrunning any opponent that fails to maintain structural integrity.

Ghalenoei's selection of Shahriar Moghanloo against New Zealand was a calculated, almost pragmatic move. Moghanloo's stature was prioritized not for his goal-scoring threat, but for his aerial presence in defending set pieces and his utility in both boxes. Against Belgium, however, where the game will be defined by transitional speed and midfield duels rather than cross-heavy assaults, Moghanloo's inclusion seems increasingly untenable. His departure from the starting XI against Belgium is all but certain.

Defensive Disarray: The Elephant on the Pitch

What was most glaring, and most heavily criticized against New Zealand, was the structural disintegration of Iran's defensive organization. Despite packing numbers into their own third, the Iranian backline allowed the Kiwis to carve through with just two or three attackers around the 18-yard box, conceding two goals far too easily.

The problems were systemic:

  • Poor spatial coverage in front of the defensive line.
  • Inadequate communication and coordination inside the penalty area.
  • Mismanagement of covering assignments during transitional phases.

These are not individual errors; they are collective breakdowns, and against a Belgian attack far more clinical and inventive than New Zealand's, such lapses would be fatal.

Expected Adjustments: A Shift to Two Holding Midfielders

Given the defensive frailties and Belgium's superior attacking pedigree, a systemic change is not just likely—it is imperative. Ghalenoei is expected to abandon the single-pivot setup and instead field two defensive midfielders in a 4–2–3–1 (or 4–3–1–2–1) shape.

  • Ezzatollahi will likely be joined by Mohammad Ghorbani (the more probable choice) or, less likely, Amir Mohammad Razaghinia, to form a double pivot.
  • This dual-screen arrangement aims to:
  • Better shield the central defensive duo (Khalilzadeh and Nemati, who are expected to retain their places).
  • Close the dangerous spaces in front of the backline.
  • Reduce the isolation of defenders when Belgium's midfielders drift into half-spaces.

In this recalibrated setup, Mehdi Taremi is likely to operate as a lone striker, with the freedom to drop deep and link play—a role he has performed with distinction at club level.

Wing Reconfiguration: Rezaian Unleashed, Hardani Anchors

Further changes are anticipated in the wide areas:

  • Aria Yousefi is expected to drop out, with Mohammad Mohebi shifting to the left wing, his more natural flank.
  • Ramin Rezaian, given his offensive instincts and goal-scoring ability, could be pushed higher to right wing.
  • Behind him, a more defensively disciplined full-back, likely Saleh Hardani, would provide cover, allowing Rezaian greater freedom to attack without exposing the flank.

Saman Ghoddos will retain his central playmaking role, operating at the tip of the midfield triangle, tasked with linking defense to attack and unlocking Belgium's defensive block.

Ghalenoei's System History: A Pattern of Pragmatism

It is worth contextualizing these potential changes within Ghalenoei's broader tactical portfolio:

  • 4–4–2 with two holding midfielders has been used in 11 matches.
  • 4–3–1–2 (as seen against New Zealand) has been deployed in 19 matches.
  • 4–2–3–1 (or its variant) has been used in 8 matches, which would become the ninth if selected against Belgium.
  • 4–1–4–1 has featured in 5 matches.
  • 4–1–4–1 with a single pivot has been used in 1 match.

The data suggests that Ghalenoei is not averse to systemic flexibility—but the question remains whether these shifts are proactive tactical evolutions or reactive patchwork responses to emerging crises.

Belgium's Vulnerabilities: Lessons from Egypt

It would be remiss not to acknowledge that Belgium, for all their star power, are far from invincible. Their last match against Egypt offered a revealing blueprint:

  • Doku, Belgium's most dynamic dribbler, was effectively neutralized by double-teaming, a tactic that nullified his direct threat and forced him into predictable passing lanes.
  • The midfield axis of Tielemans and De Bruyne was disrupted by Egypt's compact pressing and disciplined positional play, limiting their ability to dictate tempo and thread penetrating passes.

Ghalenoei would have been remiss not to take meticulous notes. If Iran can replicate Egypt's defensive discipline, doubling Doku when necessary, cutting off supply lines to De Bruyne, and maintaining compactness between the lines, they may find avenues to frustrate the European side and exploit counter-attacking opportunities.

Final Verdict: Adaptation or Repetition?

The Belgium match represents a crossroads. Ghalenoei has the personnel, the data, and the tactical history to make informed adjustments. But the recurring concern is whether he will commit to meaningful systemic evolution or simply shuffle personnel within a failing framework.

Iran's World Cup aspirations do not hinge solely on this single fixture—but the manner in which they approach it will speak volumes about the coaching staff's ability to learn, adapt, and impose their will on a high-caliber opponent. The fans, the pundits, and the players themselves deserve a coherent, courageous plan—not another chapter in an ongoing tactical identity crisis.

RankTeamPWDLGFGAGDPoints
1New Zealand10102201
2Iran10102201
3Belgium10101101
4Egypt10101101

Players' rating Iran vs. New Zealand

Rating 1 - 10

IRAN played New Zealand in the first match of FIFA World Cup 2026. The match ended in a 2-2 draw. Here are the players' ratings.

Starting Lineup

Alireza Beiranvand – [5.5]
Conceded two goals that a top-level keeper should have kept out—the second in particular was inexcusable. He handled his routine duties competently enough, but his chronic slowness in distribution remains a liability. A late-game dribble past an onrushing New Zealand forward nearly produced a calamity; luck, not judgment, saved him.

Milad Mohammadi – [6]
A subdued and largely forgettable display. Offered little going forward, with none of the trademark overlapping runs or telling crosses that make him a threat on the left. Defensively solid without being tested, but at this level, "solid" is the bare minimum.

Ali Nemati – [6]
Caught out of position on New Zealand's first goal, failing to track Just with any conviction. Beyond that lapse, he recovered reasonably well and avoided further disasters. Still, his marking left a lot to be desired. He headed brilliantly into the New Zealand goal from a cross, which was ruled offside.

Shoja Khalilzadeh – [5.5]
At fault for both goals—first for losing Chris Wood in the box, then again for failing to close him down on the assist for the second. A couple of reckless tackles flirted dangerously with a yellow card. For a player of his experience, this was a night to forget.

Ramin Rezaeian – [8.5]
Undoubtedly Iran's best performer. A goal and an assist, combined with relentless energy, made him the clear Man of the Match. That said, even he had moments of frustration—wayward crosses and occasional lapses in positioning—but his overall contribution was decisive and inspired.

Aria Yousefi – [5]
Deployed entirely out of position, and it showed. Struggled to influence play and looked uncomfortable throughout. A couple of ambitious efforts on goal offered fleeting promise, but he was largely a passenger in a role that didn't suit him.

Saeid Ezatollahi – [5]
A deeply disappointing outing from the midfielder. Offered little in attack or defense, with only a handful of tame, ineffective shots to show for his efforts. His poor marking and weak tackling directly contributed to New Zealand's opening goal. Far below the standard required.

Saman Ghoddos – [5.5]
A match to forget for the usually composed playmaker. He was sluggish in possession, visibly faded in stamina as the game wore on, and failed to supply the forwards with any meaningful service. The creative burden fell almost entirely on the wing-backs—Ghoddos was a bystander.

Mohammad Mohebi – [7.5]
Scored a brilliant header to level the score and was a constant threat in the final third. However, his link-up play with Taremi and Moghanlou lacked cohesion, and his careless loss of possession directly led to New Zealand's second goal. A performance of highs and lows—his goal should not mask his costly error.

Mehdi Taremi – [6.5]
The captain carried heavy expectations but delivered only flashes. His curling strike off the woodwork was the highlight of an otherwise muted display. His partnership with Moghanlou never clicked, and too often he dropped deep, leaving the attack isolated. For a player of his stature, this was not enough.

Shahriar Moghanlou – [6]
His most meaningful contribution came at the other end—a vital block to deny Chris Wood what would have been a second goal for New Zealand. Beyond that, he offered little in attack, registering no shots on target and struggling to impose his physical game.

Substitutes

Mehdi Ghayedi – [6]
Showed early promise after his second-half introduction, with quick feet and a willingness to take on defenders. But his influence faded rapidly, and he failed to sustain any real threat. His dribbling ability remains an asset Ghalenoei should consider using more wisely—and earlier.

Ali Alipour – [5]
Made virtually no impact against a resolute New Zealand defense. The disjointed nature of Iran's forward line did him no favors, but he offered little movement or creativity to change that. Ineffective and anonymous.

Ehsan Haji Safi – [5]
Deployed in an unfamiliar defensive midfield role rather than his preferred left-sided position. He performed adequately in possession but was exposed defensively, earning a needless yellow card after being easily bypassed by his marker. At 35, his versatility is commendable, but this was not his night.

Amirhossein Hosseinzadeh – [N/A]
Introduced too late to make any meaningful contribution. No rating.

‘Our team is the most oppressed’: Iran coach hits out at FIFA and US over treatment

The Guardian
Story by Alexander Abnos and Ben Fisher at Los Angeles Stadium

The Iran captain, Mehdi Taremi, midfielder Mohammad Mohebi, and the head coach, Amir Ghalenoei, hit out at Fifa and hinted at resentment toward the US government after being told they needed to leave Los Angeles ­immediately after Monday night’s 2-2 draw against New Zealand.

“Everything is like disaster for us,” said Taremi, who added that the Fifa president, Gianni Infantino, visited the team in the dressing room and they expressed their concerns to him directly.

Related: Iran twice come from behind to claim draw in World Cup opener with New Zealand

Ghalenoei said Iran’s treatment by Fifa makes them “the most oppressed” team at the tournament. “After the game today they said to us: ‘You have to leave immediately.’ Whereas it’s very important for us to have recovery.

“We’ve been asked to get on a plane and return to our camp in Tijuana and we are really troubled by that. They are forcing us to go back early. They are making the situation more and more difficult, more hurdles, but we’re not going to let that stop us from doing our best.

“We don’t know why they’re returning us. It’s very strange. It seems like others are doing the ­planning for us … We were ­supposed to arrive two nights before the game but they didn’t permit [it]. We were supposed to stay here tonight to recover and return tomorrow lunchtime.

“Our team is the most oppressed one in the whole World Cup. Our federation isn’t here, our media isn’t here, our management isn’t here.”

Infantino went into the Iran ­dressing room after the game and a video of his message to the squad was shared online, in which Infantino and Ghalenoei exchanged words, via a member of staff translating.

“You showed to your families, friends, to your people, to the world, that you’re in the World Cup, that you perform and you have two more games to go,” Infantino said. “In these two games you will make again ­everyone in the world proud of what you do. Thank you for being here.

“It is also a big, big emotion. I know what you go through, I understand, but you are stronger than everything. You send a strong message to the entire world. You united the whole stadium here, you united the whole stadium behind you, behind Team Melli. You are sending such a strong message to the world.

“Let me say one more thing: this is just the beginning of the World Cup. You are writing history, the whole world is watching you. Continue to play with your heart, for your ­people, your families, for your fans and for everyone in the world that is ­falling in love with Team Melli. You are stronger than everything.”

Taremi criticised a logistical ­situation that has meant the team was forced to abandon their planned training base in Tucson, Arizona weeks before the tournament, instead training across the border in Tijuana, Mexico and flying in to the US shortly before games.

The team moved its training base to avoid immigration concerns that turned out to be well founded. After arriving in Mexico, 15 of the team’s support staff were denied visas to enter the US, where all of Iran’s group stage games are taking place. That number was later reduced to 11 after some visas were approved.

The team arrived in Los Angeles minus both their media officers, some analysts and the federation ­president, Mehdi Taj. Another analyst for the team served as a stand-in media aide for Taremi and Mohebi’s appearance, which a Fifa official repeatedly attempted to stop as both players ­continued answering questions.

Related: World Cup 2026: Iran begin disrupted campaign with draw against New Zealand – in pictures

“It’s not good for the football,” Taremi said. “In [the] World Cup, you have to prepare [well] for the next game, which is a lot of stress for the players and the staff and everyone. But we don’t have that support and Fifa have to help us more than this. Let’s see what’s going to happen in the future.”

Iran faced delays in their travel from Tijuana to Los Angeles, a short trip that Taremi said took five hours. He did not specify what caused the delays, but it was understood the immigration process was the main cause. Taremi and Mohebi said being forced to leave immediately afterward would negatively affect the players’ performance at the tournament.

“It’s supposed to be: tomorrow morning recovery, then we fly to Tijuana, then we return to LA again, but right now we have to go back,” Taremi said. Mohebi added: “Yesterday we came, started the trip in the morning, and we arrive [in the] afternoon. We directly go to train and we get tired. This kind of deal is not fair … we’re going to get fatigued – hamstring, lower back, glutes …”

In contrast, Ghalenoei praised the warmth of co-hosts Mexico and many Mexicans were in attendance supporting Iran at the Los Angeles Stadium. “The Mexican people, the Mexican government, especially the people in Tijuana, made us feel at home,” he said.


 

The Draw against New Zealand: Promise and Concerns.

Team Melli began their 2026 FIFA World Cup campaign with a 2–2 draw against New Zealand in Inglewood, Los Angeles, a result that offered both promise and concern for Iranian fans.

The match was notable for several reasons, not least the starting lineup chosen by head coach Amir Ghalenoei. He unveiled a formation rarely seen in public with Team Melli with 5 defenders. The lineup featured right-back Aria Yousefi and striker Shahriar Moghanloo, a late addition to the 33-man squad in Turkey, in the starting XI. Yousefi, deployed out of his natural position, struggled to make an impact. Moghanloo, however, exceeded expectations. Despite displaying some raw technical deficiencies, the forward’s physical presence, work rate, and willingness to press and challenge for duels made him a persistent nuisance for the New Zealand defense. While his inclusion has drawn criticism from some quarters, his performance suggested he could offer a unique attacking option, provided he continues to develop his link-up play and decision-making in the final third.

The undisputed star of the match was Ramin Rezaeian. Just months ago, his place in the World Cup squad seemed uncertain, but a return to form following his transfer to Foolad Khuzestan earned him a recall, and he repaid that faith emphatically. Rezaeian scored one goal and provided a pinpoint assist for Mohammad Mohebi, earning the Player of the Match award. In doing so, he also etched his name into Iranian football history as the first and only Iranian player to score in two separate World Cups.

However, the performance of Iran’s substitutes left much to be desired. Mehdi Ghaedi, Ali Alipour, Ehsan Hajsafi, and Amirhossein Hosseinzadeh failed to inject energy or alter the flow of the game after coming on. More than the players themselves, it was Ghalenoei’s inability to read the match dynamics and introduce timely changes that proved costly against a resolute and physically strong New Zealand side.

Defensively, Iran looked vulnerable, a concern that has been voiced for months, if not years. When New Zealand attacked from deep, the Iranian backline appeared disorganized, with poor covering and a lack of cohesive teamwork. Both goals conceded stemmed from these structural frailties. With Belgium and Egypt looming, this is a glaring issue that Ghalenoei’s staff must urgently address. Given the limited preparation time and squad options, however, a dramatic improvement before the next match against Belgium seems unlikely.

Captain Mehdi Taremi was industrious as ever, covering vast amounts of ground and showing commendable stamina. Yet his technical execution fell short of the high standards expected of a player of his caliber. His best moment came in the first half, when a delightful curling effort struck the post. On that occasion, a pass to either of two better-placed teammates may have been the wiser choice, a decision that could prove critical in tighter matches.

Mohammad Mohebi, despite scoring a brilliant goal and influencing the result, was not without fault. His loss of possession directly led to New Zealand’s second goal, a mistake that must be reviewed by the coaching staff. While his attacking contribution is invaluable, such lapses cannot be overlooked at this level.

Another talking point was the absence of an experienced, high-level assistant alongside Ghalenoei. While Saeed Elhovie, Andranik Teymurian, and Rahman Rezaei possess valuable football knowledge, their experience at World Cup level is limited. In major tournaments, having seasoned support on the bench can be crucial, and this void may have been felt during key moments of the match.

The midfield unit, led by Saman Ghoddos and Saeed Ezzatollahi, struggled under New Zealand’s pressing game. Both made uncharacteristic errors, and the duo lacked influence in building attacks or shielding the defense. Ghalenoei may need to consider alternatives—such as introducing Ghorbani or Amir Mohammad Razzaghinia as a more defensive-minded presence—but the reality is that the squad lacks depth and quality in the middle of the park.

Haste was another recurring issue. Iranian players often rushed their decisions instead of controlling the tempo, leading to wasted possession and disjointed transitions. Ghalenoei must work on instilling greater composure and game management ahead of the remaining group matches.

In goal, Alireza Beiranvand delivered a generally solid performance, making several key saves. However, both New Zealand goals, particularly the second, were stoppable, and the keeper no longer resembles the commanding figure who dazzled the world in previous tournaments. Behind a fragile defense, Iran needs a goalkeeper who can provide security and leadership; Beiranvand remains the best option, but his form raises questions.

Ultimately, the draw against New Zealand was a mixed bag, a result with encouraging signs but also glaring warnings. Team Melli must build on its strengths while addressing defensive instability, midfield coherence, and tactical discipline. Much rests on Ghalenoei’s shoulders, and his tendency toward unconventional tactics and selection choices will continue to invite scrutiny. The road ahead is steep, but with focused preparation, Iran can still make its mark on this World Cup.

Team Melli's possible lineup vs New Zealand

The Iranian national football team will face New Zealand (FIFA Rank #85) in its first match of the FIFA World Cup 2026 on Tuesday morning, June 16th, at 04:30 Tehran time in Los Angeles, USA.

After a scare, it seems that Mehdi Taremi is fit enough to start the match for Iran. The number 9 striker, who has played 105 international matches so far, will enter the field with 60 international goals in the main lineup and will try to increase this impressive statistic.

In the attack, Taremi will be supported by two other goal scorers, Mohammad Mohebi and Mehdi Ghaedi; players who have 14 and 10 international goals in their portfolios, respectively, and play an important role in the team’s offensive phase.

However, Team Melli is also facing several injury issues; Alireza Jahanbakhsh, Dennis Eckert ( two players who have not featured in the pre-tournament camp), and Mehdi Torabi are likely to miss the match, while Roozbeh Cheshmi's condition is also uncertain and has been postponed until the final fitness tests.

Saman Ghoddos is likely to retain his place in the starting lineup, while Saeed Ezzatollahi and Amir Mohammad Razaghinia will play in the middle of the field as a central midfield pair. In defense, Ramin Rezaian and Ehsan Hajsafi will cover the flanks on either side of the defensive line, while the pair of Shoja Khalilzadeh and Hossein Kananizadegan will be in the heart of the defense.

This defense will protect the national team's number one goalkeeper, Alireza Beiranvand, a goalkeeper who will undoubtedly be in the starting lineup to ensure Iran has a strong start to the World Cup.

Possible Iran lineup:
Alireza Beiranvand; Ramin Rezaian, Shoja 'a Khalilzadeh, Hossein Kananizadegan, Ehsan Hajsafi;

Saeid Ezzatollahi, Saman Ghoddos Amir Mohammad Razaghinia;


Mohammad Mohebbi, Mehdi Hagedi and Mehdi Taremi

Iran vs. New Zealand referee announced.

Team Melli opener at the Sofi Stadium in Inglewood, Los Angeles, against New Zealand will be refereed by the Mexican César Arturo Ramos.
The 42-year-old Mexican international referee has refereed in the FIFA World Cup 2018 and 2022. He refereed the 2022 FIFA World Cup semi-final match between France and Morocco on 14 December.

Ramos was the referee of Team Melli's match against Oman in AFC Asian Cup 2019

Ramos will be assisted by compatriots Alberto Morin and Marco Bisguerra.

The 4th Official is Vusuke Araki of Japan

The match starts at 6 PM local time.

Team Melli defeats Mali in the last preparation match before the World Cup

For its last World Cup warm-up match, played this Thursday in Antalya (Turkey), behind closed doors, Iran beat Mali (2-0). Before flying to Mexico on Saturday and returning to their base camp in Tijuana during the World Cup (June 11-July 19), Iran won their last warm-up match against Mali (2-0) on Thursday. This result comes after a first victory against Gambia (3-1), on May 29.
The match was held behind closed doors, without any media, at the Titanic Stadium in Antalya, Turkey, where Team Melli had started its gathering. Both goals were scored by Saeid Ezatolahi (14th) and Ramin Rezaeian (55th).

Amir Ghalenoei made 9 substitutions in a match that saw two of the excluded players given minutes in the match, including a debut match for Hadi Habibinejad, who replaced Arya Yousefi in the 77th minute. Amirhossein Mahmoudi also found playing time

The 21st nation in the FIFA ranking will start the competition on July 15 against New Zealand. In Group G, the Iranians, who have received their visas for Mexico but not yet for the United States, will also face New Zealand and Egypt.